Unexplained Wealth Orders
Have you got a question?
In January 2018, the UK introduced Unexplained Wealth Orders (UWOs) with the purpose of requiring certain people to explain their interest in certain property and the source of the money they used to purchase it.
What is an Unexplained Wealth Order?
A UWO is a type of investigation order that has been issued by the High Court. The main purpose of these orders is to require people to prove how they lawfully acquired certain property that would normally be beyond their means.
Unexplained Wealth Orders act as a gateway to forfeit the property under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 or to acquire information which can be used to further other investigations. The focus and aim of UWOs will be to make civil recoveries of proceeds of crimes.
Who can apply for an Unexplained Wealth Order?
There are a number of relevant enforcement authorities that can apply for UWOs and they are:
- the National Crime Agency
- Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- the Financial Conduct Authority
- the Serious Fraud Office
- the Crown Prosecution Service
When can they apply for this order?
An application must be made to the High Court by these authorities in order to obtain a UWO.
The following criteria must be met to satisfy the High Court before making an order:
- There is a genuine reason to believe that the person in question owns the property and it is worth over £50,000
- The is reasonable grounds to believe that this persons lawful income would not be sufficient to obtain the property
- The Person is believed to be involved in a serious crime or is a Politically Exposed Person (PEP) (someone who has been entrusted with a prominent public function and are higher risk to bribery and corruption due to their influence in the role)
What happens when subjected to a UWO?
Someone who is subjected to an Unexplained Wealth Order, you must provide a response with explanations covering the following:
- The nature and extent of their interest in the property
- How the property was obtained, particularly how costs were covered
If the defendant does not respond and has no reasonable excuse to not doing so, this will result in the property being presumed to be recoverable property under PoCA 2002. This essentially is a reversal of the burden of proof as the person is required to prove that the property is not the proceeds of crime, rather than requiring the state to prove that it is.
It is a criminal offence for any respondent to make a statement that is false or misleading in any way. The charge for anyone found guilty of this offence is imprisonment for up to 2 years.
What if the property is outside of the UK?
It does not matter if the property is outside the UK or if the respondent is not a UK resident as UWOs have an international reach.
UK enforcement authorities may seek assistance from governments of the country where the asset is based and obtain a freezing order. This can prevent anyone from that country dealing with the relevant property.
What to do next?
If you have been served with an Unexplained Wealth Order it is of vital importance to seek legal advice immediately.
Alessio, with the Marketing team, strives to help colleagues excel with client care, while also keeping the firm ‘on the pulse’ regarding the most critical...
-
Aviation House, 125 Kingsway
London WC2B NH
United Kingdom
- (+44) 020-3051-5060
Book a call back
Share this article
Got a question?
Please complete this form to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one member of our team.
Related posts
Landmark Aviation Cases Set New Standards in EU261 Interpretation
Our client is a company listed in Shanghai Stock Exchange, one of the biggest intelligent power distribution solution providers as well as manufacturer of smart meters, transformers, box-type substations, E-Car charger and photovoltaic inverters.
The digitation of the Italian public procurement lifecycle: Artificial Intelligence application in procurement from January
A definitive law for oncological oblivion, namely the opportunity for individuals who have recovered from an oncological condition to erase the ‘bureaucratic’ negative effects that the disease still imposes on employment searches, adoptions, mortgage applications, or insurance subscriptions.
Redefining loyalty: Tesco’s brand evolution amidst Legal challenges
Tesco was embroiled in a legal battle against Lidl that reached the Court of Appeal over claims arising from alleged infringement of copyright
Reforming the Arbitration Act 1996: A Look at the Law Commission’s Recommendations
Have you got a question? Enquire Now Kristi Vako and Fatma Ozsayan have looked at the new recommendations published by the Law Commission.
