Criminal Barristers End Boycott of Legal Aid Work
Have you got a question?
The result of a ballot organised by the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) that has taken place over the weekend has confirmed that criminal barristers have voted by a narrow margin to accept the government’s offer of £15m in justice investment. Prior to this, criminal barristers had been subjected to a prolonged dispute surrounding budget cuts to which brought the boycott to ahead; with over 100 chambers refusing to take on new legal aid work under the advocates graduated fee scheme since April 1st.
The chair of the CBA, Angela QC has commented “whilst the majority wishes to accept the proposal it cannot be said that the anger and disillusionment have gone away. Indeed, it is exceptionally strong. The Criminal Bar is not going to be quiet.’’
The Criminal Bar Association of England and Wales postponed the implementation of a “no returns” policy awaiting today’s result; however, this will consequently, not proceed. Preventing what the law society gazette reports as “potentially throwing the court system into chaos.’’
What is now to be expected is the enactment of The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) offer which includes the following:
• An extra £8m for fraud, drug and child sex cases that lose out under the new fee scheme;
• A 1% increase in advocacy payments from April 2019 (£2.5m);
• Further funding of approximately £4.5m, more for juniors
However, many remain torn on the result as from the total of 3,038 barristers who voted in the proposals, 1,566 voted to accept and a close 1,472 voted against.
Max Walters of the Law Society Gazette comments on the prosperous nature of this result and the effect it may have in relation to the litigators’ graduated fee scheme (LDFS) ahead of a High Court judicial review hearing this summer. He Quotes Law Society president Joe Egan “We hope the MoJ will now withdraw their opposition to the Law Society’s judicial review for the LGFS scheme cuts. We look forward to a similar announcement in relation to the work carried out by solicitors, including the withdrawal of the most recent pages of prosecution evidence (PPE) cut.’’
Angela Qc concluded with the following statement: “This outcome is neither a defeat nor a victory. The Criminal Bar has faced degradation and despair and it still does. This is a step forward. We must all ensure we do not take any more steps back.’’
Alessio, with the Marketing team, strives to help colleagues excel with client care, while also keeping the firm ‘on the pulse’ regarding the most critical...
-
Aviation House, 125 Kingsway
London WC2B NH
United Kingdom
- (+44) 020-3051-5060
Book a call back
Share this article
Got a question?
Please complete this form to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one member of our team.
Related posts
Compensation secured from injury caused by e-scooter used in a London overground train station
Suffering an injury at work can be a stressful and traumatic experience. Apart from dealing with the pain and recovery, you may also have to take time off work, lose wages, and incur medical expenses.
The Call for Regulating AI and Its Implications for Business
While the European Parliament is making significant strides in formulating comprehensive regulations for artificial intelligence through the proposed Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), the implications for businesses are becoming increasingly evident.
Reforming the Arbitration Act 1996: A Look at the Law Commission’s Recommendations
Have you got a question? Enquire Now Kristi Vako and Fatma Ozsayan have looked at the new recommendations published by the Law Commission.
The digitation of the Italian public procurement lifecycle: Artificial Intelligence application in procurement from January
A definitive law for oncological oblivion, namely the opportunity for individuals who have recovered from an oncological condition to erase the ‘bureaucratic’ negative effects that the disease still imposes on employment searches, adoptions, mortgage applications, or insurance subscriptions.